|
Welcome to the Kitty Hawk Aeronautics,
Incorporated Enterprise Architecture (EA) Program Plan and Communication
page. This is the place to get information about our Enterprise
Architecture strategy, approach, plan, and program structure and
activities. Click on the graphic
below to find information on the program elements listed.
Check back often because new information is added regularly. If you have
any questions or comments about the EA plan or program, please contact
our Chief Architect, Robert Osborn.

|
| |
|
| Our Vision: |
| |
To be a diverse enterprise working in a global environment by 2010. |
| |
|
Our Mission: |
| |
To be a premier global manufacturer and supplier of high quality
aerospace electronics, providing value to our customers, employees, and
stakeholders. |
| |
|
|
Enterprise Architecture
Purpose: |
| |
Enterprise architecture is both a management program and a documentation
method that together provides an actionable, coordinated view of our
company’s strategic direction, business processes, information flows,
and resource utilization. Our enterprise architecture provides the
company-wide roadmap that enables us to achieve our mission by
optimizing performance in core business processes supported by an
efficient information technology environment. Kitty Hawk’s enterprise
architecture repository website provides a means to access EA program
information and resources, which provide the “blueprint” for defining
our current (baseline) and desired (target) environment, and includes a
management plan for transitioning from the baseline environment to the
target environment. |
| |
|
|
Enterprise Architecture
Program Value: |
| |
Enterprise architecture
provides the building blocks that drive Kitty Hawk’s strategic direction
and approach to planning and decision-making. To be successful, it must
be owned by all company stakeholders (executives, managers, and team
members) and should be used to inform, guide, and manage the decisions
of the enterprise. More specifically, EA provides the following
benefits:
-
Brings together views of
strategy, business and technology that allow us to see ourselves in
current and future operating states.
-
Supports the modeling of
different future operating scenarios to help us respond to changes,
both internal and external to our business.
-
Establishes an integrated
set of IT resource planning, decision-making, and implementation
processes that help us recognize and resolve performance gaps across
the company.
-
Promotes enterprise-wide
thinking about how we use our resources, as opposed to less effective
stovepipe-centric approaches. An enterprise-wide, common operating
environment for business and technology allows Kitty Hawk to function
with greater efficiency, flexibility, and capabilities, and thus
enhances our competitiveness in the marketplace.
-
Improves company-wide
communication through regular updates to the baseline of integrated
information on strategy, business, and technology.
-
Provides standardized
approaches for the development and management of enterprise resources.
-
Contributes to our
profitability and success through shortened planning and
decision-making cycles (enhanced planning efficiency), improved
reference information, reduced duplication of resources and re-work,
improved resource integration and performance, improved communication,
and reduction in production-cycle time.
|
| |
|
|
Our Strategic
Goals: |
| |
KITTY
HAWK 2005-2010 STRATEGIC PLAN
|
|
Strategic Goals |
Strategic Initiatives |
Strategic Measures |
-
Use
enterprise architecture approach to document current and future
corporate architectures in a way that integrates strategy,
business, and technology planning.
-
Increase profit by at least 7% per year.
-
Establish a customer base in Asia/Europe for the Commercial
Aviation line of business.
-
Establish a “General Aviation Systems” line of business.
-
Control costs by establishing activity based cost accounting in
all lines of business.
-
Improve the value of investments in information technology.
|
Commercial
Aviation Systems:
-
Roll-out a new commercial component manufacturing plant
in
San Diego,
California
(200 new employees).
-
Expand avionics product line to include McDonald Douglas
MD-80.
-
Improve electrical harness product line quality and cost
competitiveness.
Defense
Systems:
·
Deliver the MH53J Pave-Low IV Tactical
Communications Radio for the
U.S.
Special Forces Command.
·
Deliver FA-18 Block-III VHF radios to Naval
Aviation Systems Command.
·
Support Northrop Grumman outfitting of US Coast
Guard Deepwater Cutter UHF/VHF radios.
Space
Systems:
·
Deliver the recently-awarded USAF Ultra-Low-Latency
Satellite Communications System, and migrate functionality and
data from the legacy USAF GeoTalk System.
·
In partnership with the Jet Propulsion Lab, develop
the telemetry system for the Mars Lander IV Program.
·
Support Raytheon as subcontractor in delivering the
Challenge Athena III Wideband Satellite Communication System.
Research and
Development:
·
As a subcontractor to Boeing, support research and
development activities for the Next-Generation Space Shuttle
Avionics Program (NGSSAP).
·
Develop multi-function electronics busses for the
Boeing Dreamliner.
Finance and
Administration:
·
Establish an enterprise-wide cost accounting system
and migrate from separate legacy finance, payroll, and general
ledger accounting systems.
·
Integrate financial information with sales and
warehouse data, and establish access controlled data marts that
push pre-formatted reports daily.
Technology
Support:
·
Establish and maintain an enterprise architecture
program and on-line repository of actionable EA information.
·
Establish an IT capital planning program to improve
the value of investments in IT.
·
Expand the IT Common Operating Environment (IT-COE)
to host all front-office and back-office applications at each
company location, and expand LAN/WAN capabilities.
·
Develop and implement a follow-on IT Security
solution for the IT-COE.
Contacts and
Legal:
·
Implement a performance-based contracting approach
that uses standard on-line templates and a document
tracking/correspondence control system
·
Integrate contracting information with finance and
accounting information.
·
Upgrade legacy Lexus/Nexus on-line legal library
system, make available in
San Diego.
Shipping and
Receiving:
-
Expand the Warehouse and Shipping Department at the
San
Diego facility.
-
Reduce average warehouse handling time by 10% per year
for 2005-2008.
|
TBD - Determine outcome measures that identify when
each strategic initiative has successfully met a strategic goal.
|
|
| |
|
|
Our Approach: |
| |
A
centerpiece for Kitty Hawk’s EA vision is the EAł cube framework and
implementation methodology. The EA framework defines what
will be documented in the EA, and the implementation methodology defines
how the documentation will be gathered and used. The EAł cube
framework depicts the foundational elements for establishing an EA
program, the scope of the EA documentation effort, and integrating the
areas of the architecture together. The EA implementation methodology
provides a detailed procedure for establishing, maintaining, and using
the EA framework. |
| |
|
Understanding the framework
The
framework model below provides the overall baseline structure for
modeling Kitty Hawk’s business and technology operating environment.
The EAł framework is a cube, which represents the various levels
and depth of EA documentation areas. The multiple layers of depth are
functional activity areas, which are described as lines of business.
The depicted layers are organized hierarchically from both a business
and technology perspective and contain components, or working elements
of the framework, at each level. These components are documented in EA
artifacts (e.g. goals, strategies, guidelines, services, diagrams, etc.)
which describe the EA framework and associated EA components at each
level. Together, the framework components work together to form a
holistic, integrated view of the IT operating environment that
effectively supports the enterprise’s business needs.
Understanding the implementation methodology
The
following phases describe the procedures being used to develop, use, and
maintain the EA program and documentation approach. This implementation
methodology enables us to create the EA program in a systematic,
detailed way, so as to maximize our efficiency and accuracy.
-
Phase 1
– EA Program Establishment – activities within this phase help to
establish the EA program, identify a Chief Architect to lead the
program, create an EA governance capability to mange the EA program,
and develop an EA communication plan to gain stakeholder buy-in and
support.
-
Phase 2
– EA Framework and Tool Selection – activities within this phase help
to select an EA framework, EA components that will define the
architecture within each functional area, and software
applications/tools to support automated EA documentation.
-
Phase 3
– Documentation of the EA – activities within this phase include
documentation of current and future views of the architecture and
development of the EA Management Plan to describe how the architecture
will transition over time.
-
Phase 4
– Use and Maintain the EA – the final phase activities are ongoing and
serve to promote the use of EA information and ensure that the
information is regularly updated.
|
| |
|
|
Governance: |
| |
The
purpose of Enterprise Architecture governance is to manage, control, and
monitor Enterprise Architecture activities and progress. The below
figure illustrates the structure of Kitty Hawk’s Enterprise Architecture
governance. This organization structure, its processes and procedures,
and its roles and responsibilities, facilitate and advance Enterprise
Architecture performance.

The IT
Technology Council and Strategic Management Council provide direction
for the Enterprise Architecture Council, which is managed by the Chief
Architect. The EA Architecture Council also manages a series of
advisory teams comprised of representatives from Kitty Hawk functional
organizations, who provide input to the EA direction and evolution. The
advisory teams include a strategic planning team, process action teams,
and support teams. |
| |
|
|
Schedule (In-Progress): |
| |
The below schedule provides an overview of EA Program schedule
milestones for 2005 and 2006. |
| |

|
| |
|
| |
|
|